1/125th sec at F9, 100mm at ISO 100

My new iPad arrived on Friday. I went for the baseline spec, partly on price, but principally because I intend using it at home [no 3G], and reckon that I’ll rotate content off it regularly enough, especially video, not to feel constrained by the capacity.

I wonder how many people up and down the UK sparked up the Times application this morning and, like me, were annoyed to find that it doesn’t include the The Sunday Times. Having had a couple of days to play with the thing, my general impression of the software is that it’s overpriced. The Times app is quite nice, but makes up for any deficiencies by virtue of having fantastic content. Its pricing policy is another matter altogether. I’m hoping that there will be some sort of in-app purchase to pick up the Sunday Times. I’m not particularly interested in reading a paper every day – which is what the £9.99 will transform into, a monthly subscription.

I’ve written before about the novelty tax that I felt consumers are being asked to pay for eBooks, and the fact that it irks me to be expected to pay more than the commonly available price [i.e., Amazon or supermarkets] just to have the dubious honour of reading an electronic copy of a book.

The iPad takes this one step further: we have a direct price comparison to draw on with an existing market, for iPhone apps. So we have a screen resolution penalty to pay on top of everything else?

Hopefully the prices will calm down in a couple of months….